UNITED ACTION FRONT SOCIETY (REGD.)

(UNITED FOR TRUTH, JUSTICE AND EQUALITY)

OFFICE : 2190, Sector 21-C, Chandigarh

E-mail : unitedcoop@gmail.com

Click here for Latest Updates

Home
Scam
Chronicle
Latest News
283 Member List
Unanswered
Pending
Actions Required
Directory
Contact Us

History and the Sequence of Events:

The United Cooperative House Building Society was allotted 9.40 acres of land in Sector 68, Mohali by PUDA for construction of 364 dwelling units on 14.03.2000.  However on actual measurement of the land, the area was found to be 8.75 acre instead of 9.40 acres.  Consequently PUDA reduced the number of dwelling units from 364 to 338.  However the managing committee of the society, headed by its president Mr. Swaran Singh, enrolled many bogus members in the society to satisfy their vested interests and the society produced the name "Bogus Society" for itself.  Following the revelation, some members of the society filed a petition, which pleaded that the list of 356 members submitted by the society to PUDA was not genuine.  The Court of the Registrar Cooperative Societies, in its orders passed on 23rd Feb 2000, held that the membership of the society was “bogus” and constituted a three-member scrutiny committee to ascertain the genuineness of the members of society.  On appeal, the orders of Registrar were upheld by the Financial Commissioner, Cooperation vide his orders dated 04.10.2000 and then by the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court vide their orders dated 08.02.2002 in CWP No. 16968 of 2000.  After the scrutiny, the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab passed the order dated 31.05.2002 holding 231 members of the society as genuine.  These orders were also challenged before the Financial Commissioner, Cooperation, who set aside the same vide his orders dated 8.8.2003 and directed that the “Registrar should give an opportunity to all the interested parties by issuance of a public notice and carry out an in-depth probe into genuineness of members of the society in order to avoid any malpractice or giving a chance to the interested elements to enroll fictitious names for their own vested interest”.  These orders of FCC were also challenged before the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in CWP No. 16577 of 2003.  The Hon’ble High Court, vide orders dated 20.11.2003 upheld the orders of FCC with the directions that no member of the Society is to be condemned unheard and full opportunity be afforded by the Scrutiny Committee to the members to present their claims/objections.  The Hon’ble High Court, further directed the scrutiny committee to submit its report latest by 31.07.2004. 

In March, 2004 the scrutiny committee comprising of three senior most Additional Registrars carried out the detailed scrutiny of 599 members as per the society records and only 286 members were found to be genuine.  The list of 286 genuine members was notified by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies vide its detailed orders dated 31.07.2004.  Other members, most of them transferees, were found to be bogus, since these persons never replied to repeated public notices and registered letters sent to them by the scrutiny committee returned undelivered.  However, while the list of 599 members was being scrutinised by the Cooperative Department, the President and Secretary of the society conspired with the Contractor and sold 109 flats in the open market between Jan to Mar 2004 after charging huge premiums from them following increase in market prices of flats.  The purchasers of these flats were substituted as members of the society against the non-existent/bogus members.  Most of these persons were enrolled and charged directly by the contractor and they were even committed the floors on which they will be allotted the flats. And obviously, higher premiums were charged for better floors.  The scrutiny committee in its report dated 31.07.2004 also recorded on Page 36 of its report that :

“It is strange that while scrutiny committee was examining genuineness of originally enrolled members, the Managing Committee of the society was not only enrolling new members but was audacious enough to delete membership of a large number of originally enrolled members.  These newly enrolled members have then been put into the shoes of old non-genuine members who have not come forward before the Scrutiny Committee to establish their genuineness.  There is a serious question mark on this action of the managing committee of the society. Almost all the members whose place has been shown taken by the new members are those who had not responded to the public notices etc. and have thus been declared as non-genuine by the Scrutiny Committee”

 

Page 36 (540 kb), Complete report (39 Pages - 24 MB Size)

 

After the orders of Scrutiny Committee, the 286 members declared genuine by the committee, were issued the demand notices on 09.09.2004 <click here to see (670 kb)> to deposit the land cost amounting to Rs. 2.35 Lacs per member within one month.  However without waiting for any payments from genuine members, on 12.09.2004 itself, the society management arbitrarily allotted the flats with their own whims & fancies.  Most of the allotments were given to the near and dear ones or to those persons from whom hefty premiums were charged without any consideration of genuineness of their membership.  No notice was issued to the members/Registrar regarding any meeting/draw and no draw of lots was held.  The flats were allotted as per the premiums charged from the person or to the near and dear ones in gross violation of bye-laws, rules & regulations.  The office of the Registrar Co-operative Societies and members of the society were not even informed of the date of allotment, what to talk of their being present at the allotment.  Cash receipts amounting to a total of Rs. 31 Lacs were issued in his own favor and in the favor of his near and dear ones by Mr. Swaran Singh on 11.09.2004 to make them eligible for allotment of flats {1. Swaran Singh (Self) - Rs. 30000 to 235000, 2. Gagandeep (Son) - Rs 25000 to 235000, 3. Kulbir Singh (Nephew) - Rs 40000 to 235000, 4. Balbir Singh (Nephew) - Rs 40000 to 235000 and many more}, while many genuine members who had paid much more money than Mr. Swaran Singh himself were not even spared an opportunity to pay the balance money and were declared ineligible/defaulters.  It is however learnt that the cash amount of Rs 31 Lacs, for which the receipts were issued on 11.09.2004 was never deposited in the bank accounts of the society.  Similarly, many other persons were issued receipts in back date to make them eligible for allotment of flats over genuine members.  Some allotments were made to the persons who were not even primary members of the society.  While allotting the flats, most of the genuine members were left out and were neither asked to deposit any money nor allotted any flat at all, thereby cheating them and depriving them of their legitimate right of getting their share in the society.  In fact the flats were sold in the market just like private builders and higher premiums were charged for flats at prime locations.  Further the perspective buyers were even allotted their committed flats with least respect or concern for the rules, regulations and law of land.  On receiving complaints about this, the then Financial Commissioner (Coop) vide his orders dated 04.02.2005 directed the Registrar to Constitute a Scrutiny Committee under the chairmanship of Sh. Raminder Singh I.A.S (Addl. Registrar Admn.) for verifying the genuineness of 109 members.  Further, the orders also directed the managing committee of society not to induct any new members and not to make any illegal allotments to individuals.  The Scrutiny Committee issued a notice dated 25.02.2005 <click here to see the notice (400kb only)>, which was carried by local newspapers on 28.02.2005, calling these 109 members to file their claims within 15 days i.e, upto 15.03.2005.

However, in the meantime the managing committee also managed to get occupancy certificate of 104 flats from Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (PUDA) on 03.03.2005, which was issued by PUDA in gross violation of clause 10 of its own land allotment letter No. PUDA-A-4/2000/76 dated 14.03.2000.  It is further pertinent to note that occupancy certificate was issued by PUDA inspite of the fact that the society was a persistent defaulter on account of payment of land cost.  The 286 genuine members had deposited an amount to the tune of Rs. 15 Crores and 210 newly inducted members had deposited an amount of Rs. 11 Crores besides the premium, which was paid underhand.  However it is learnt that a major chunk of money collected from members for payment of land cost to PUDA was channelised to buy properties and land at Dera Bassi and elsewhere through advance payments worth crores of rupees to the contractor M/s U. T. Builders by Mr. Swaran Singh.  However there was a constant default on account of payment of land cost to PUDA and the members had to bear penalties and penal interest of crores of rupees imposed on the society by PUDA on account of payment defaults.  In this regard, Registrar, Co-operative Societies Punjab vide his letter No. 8702 dated 01.07.2005 ordered an enquiry headed by Superintending Engineer (Housefed), Punjab,  to ascertain the actual cost of flats being constructed by the society and alleged excess payments made to the contractors.  After repeated requests to the managing committee for submitting the requisite record, S.E. (HOUSEFED) submitted an incomplete report on 09.11.2006 <click here to see the report> which clearly mentioned that the managing committee has not co-operated at all in the enquiry and has not supplied any record.  It was further mentioned that from the available record and measurements taken from the site it is evident that the contractors M/s ADD ON Builders have executed the work of Rs. 7.60 Crores and M/s U.T. Builders have executed the work of Rs. 10.22 Crores till date.  While as per the information gathered from the Office of Registrar Co-op Societies,  the managing committee has made payments of Rs. 8.95 Crores and 17.62 Crores to M/s ADD ON Builders and M/s U.T. Builders respectively.  This means that an advance payment to the tune of Rs. 8.75 Crores was made to the contactors whereas there was a consistent default of payment to PUDA.

However inspite of the consistent payment defaults, the occupancy certificate was issued by PUDA and after getting the occupancy certificate Mr. Swaran Singh handed over physical possessions of the half built flats to the illegally enrolled members whose fate was yet to be ascertained by the scrutiny committee while deserting the genuine members of the society who had actually paid for the construction of flats over the years.  These persons were further advised that they should immediately occupy the flats and also complete the construction and get the furnishing work done so that it becomes difficult to oust them by the authorities.  After moving into the flats, the residents also had a very tough time because at that time the society didn't even had a water and sewerage connection.  A temporary electricity connection taken by the builder for construction of flats was extended to the residents and they had to pay commercial rates for electricity for many months.  It is further pertinent to note that the term of the managing committee had expired on 04.03.2005 and Assistant Registrar, Mohali was appointed administrator of the society by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab.  But the self styled Honorary Secretary, Mr Swaran Singh,  issued the allotment letters and handed over illegal physical possessions of flats to some 39 members on 06.03.2005 with the convenience of newly appointed administrator.  However when some genuine members of the society tried to ascertain their status from the Honorary Secretary Mr. Swaran Singh, they were defrauded, misguided and were given to understand that they have been declared as in-genuine by the scrutiny committee constituted by the Registrar and therefore their shares have been forfeited.  The Honorary Secretary even refused to deposit of installment amount from the members.  Shocked at this, the members reported the matter to Director General of Police, Punjab and the police enquiry in the matter revealed that Mr. Swaran Singh had allegedly sold flats of the Society to Non-members following a rise in their market prices.  Following the enquiry report an FIR was lodged against Mr. Swaran Singh and the CIA staff, Ropar arrested Swaran Singh on 18.03.2005 under Sections 406, 420, 468, 471 & 120-B of the IPC. <Click here to see the copy of news item published by local newspapers (50kb only)> He was however later released on bail and the case (FIR No. 83 dated 17.03.2005) is gathering dust with the police department since last more than 20 months.

However, when this news was carried by the local News Papers, the Additional Registrar (Admin), Co-op Societies, Punjab, issued the following warning to the Administrator of the society (Asstt. Registrar, Co-op Societies, Punjab) vide his letter No. Addl RCS (A)/3643 dated 24.03.2005

"The Interim orders of worthy F.C.C., dated 04.02.2005 have already been conveyed to you by the office of RCS, Punjab, Chandigarh for strict and meticulous compliance.  However it has come to my notice that while the process of scrutiny as per the interim orders of worthy F.C.C. is still under progress by the scrutiny committee constituted for the purpose (chaired by undersigned), grave malpractices such as illegal allotments and giving unauthorised possessions to the individuals whose fate is yet to be ascertained (still under scrutiny) are still continuing.  This may further aggravate/complicate the problem.  Therefore you are hereby directed to engage the services of a private security agency for ousting the unauthorised people till the final decision is taken by the Government in this case as the matter is already in the notice of the Govt.  You are directed to comply with promptly and it shall be your personal responsibility."

 

Click here to see the true copy of the letter (32kb only)

In addition to the above the following NOTICE was published in the newspapers and was also placed at the construction site of society to bring these gross irregularities in the notice of members and general public being misled by the managing committee (Picture 1)

“Common Public is intimated that as per the orders of Hon’ble Financial Commissioner, the office of Registrar Co-operative Societies, Punjab is conducting a probe into the membership of the flats being constructed by the United Cooperative House Building Society Limited, Mohali and Sh. Dalbir Singh, Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Ropar has been appointed as the Administrator of the society after the expiry of the tenure of its managing committee.  The previous managing committee is offering plots/flats and possession in an unauthorised manner, which is illegal.  Therefore the general public is intimated that no person should try to occupy or do any additional construction in any flat because the flats shall be allotted to the eligible members after final decision by the Government.  Legal action shall be taken against the person who shall violate the above orders. – By Order Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab, Chandigarh.”

 

(Disclaimer :  The above matter has been translated from Punjabi.  Although all efforts have been made to reproduce the exact translation but any mistake on this account shall be purely coincidental.  No legal claim is made regarding the accuracy of the translation. The original photograph of the NOTICE in Punjabi is also placed for ready reference)

Following these developments, there was a great uncertainty and fear amongst the members of the society.  Under these circumstances some members of the society took initiative to assemble and guide the society members under the name and style of UNITED ACTION FRONT. 

However, fearing action from the authorities, 39 beneficiary members to whom illegal possessions were offered by Swaran Singh, filed 3 different petition in the Civil Courts of Kharar restraining the Society from ousting them from the flats.  The Hon'ble court ordered a status quo to be maintained till the decision of petition.

However again making mockery of the court orders, Mr. Swaran Singh issued many more possession letters in back date and by the end of 2005 about 80 flats stands occupied.  Again the official of the Cooperative Department are mock spectators and most of the concerned officials were found speaking the language of culprits when they were asked to take action against these illegal occupants.  The officials of the department were physically taken to the site by the Adhoc Committee members and were shown that more than 80 flats stands occupied in violation of the court order.  However, no action was taken by the department and as a result some beneficiaries of the illegal allotment have even started renovating the flats in the next block of the society for which the possession letters have still not been issued by the society because of the stay granted by the Hon'ble Court.

In the meantime, the Scrutiny Committee summoned 109 members on 08.04.2005 out of which only 67 members appeared before the committee while other 42 were again found to be non-existent. The Scrutiny Committee submitted its report on 22.04.2005, with the following findings and recommendations:

“The scrutiny of new members enrolled between January and March 2004 was carried out by the Scrutiny Committee.  Out of 109 members, only 62 members appeared before the committee on 08.04.2005 and every member was asked to produce the proof of his identity.  Every member produced the documents.  All 109 members were enrolled between January to March 2004 and almost all members were enrolled by way of transfer of membership of an old member.  Column No 7 of the enclosed performa shows the membership number of the new members.  The details of the old member against whom new member has been enrolled is also given at Column No 5 of the performa.  From the analysis of the record, it has been noticed that none of the new members have been enrolled against those members who were declared genuine (286) by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab in his orders dated 31.07.2004.  Rather those members who were declared non-genuine/bogus by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab in his orders dated 31.07.2004 have been substituted to enroll these new members.  Although all these members have paid an amount ranging from Rs. 1 Lac to 12 Lacs for getting the flat, but still these newly enrolled members cannot be declared as genuine members.  Further investigations have revealed that even after March 2004 and till February 2005, the President and Secretary of the managing committee has enrolled many new members after taking huge money from them.  The scrutiny of these members is being done separately by this office.

 

In compliance of Hon’ble Financial Commissioner, Cooperative orders dated 04.02.2005, the above report is submitted and it is reiterated that 109 new members enrolled between January and March 2004 does not qualify to be the genuine members of the society.”

 

Click here to see the copy of the original report (190kb only)

 

(Disclaimer :  The above matter has been translated from Punjabi.  Although all efforts have been made to reproduce the exact translation but any mistake on this account shall be purely coincidental. No legal claim is made regarding the accuracy of the translation. The original version of the document in Punjabi is also placed for ready reference)

However, while the department was contemplating the list of 109 members, the president and secretary of the society enrolled yet another 101 members again on huge premiums.   Further the self-contained and detailed reports of these scrutiny committees had made it amply clear that the Managing Committee had intentionally enrolled the bogus members so that these shares could be sold in the open market at a later date to earn premium at the cost of genuine members.  However when the Hon’ble High Court ordered the detailed scrutiny of membership, the President and Secretary of the society immediately transferred some of these shares in favor of new members, while some other bogus names were again incorporated, so that these flats could be sold at still higher premiums at a later date.  The same was reflected in the second scrutiny when only 62 out of 109 newly enrolled members appeared before the scrutiny committee.  However, all these self speaking findings of scrutiny committees and gross misconducts by the managing committee making mockery of all rules/regulations and law of land  failed to convince the new Financial Commissioner (Coop), S. K. Sinha who vide his orders dated 26.07.2005, not only declared all 109 members as genuine contrary to the recommendations of scrutiny committees constituted by his predecessors but also regularised the newly inducted 101 members without any verification thereby annulling the long drawn process of verification of genuineness of membership.  Mr. Sinha in his orders dated 26.07.2005 said as under:

 “The Managing Committee is the competent to enroll new members and this has been so held even by the F.C.C. in his order dated 26.12.2003.  I find that there is no malafide in enrolling the new members and the new members were enrolled in the interest of the Society.  The genuineness of the members was to be considered of the members which were subject matter of litigation before the Financial Commissioner and the High Court.  There is no restriction on the rights of the Managing Committee to limit the number of members or enroll new members under the Act, Rules or the bye-laws.  Although as per the committee report, they have been enrolled as new members in place of non-genuine members but the fact remains that they are the newly enrolled members.  They have paid interest of the society by the managing committee to pay the claims of PUDA for the land allotted to them, which is the objective of the society and which they were fully competent to do so.  Therefore, I hold the newly enrolled 109 members as also the subsequent enrolment on or before 04.02.2005 to be genuine and in the interest of the Society.”

 

Click here to see the copy of the order (3.12 MB)

The orders took the total membership of society again to 286+109+101 = 496 against 338 flats available with the society.  The orders of Mr. Sinha regularised all misdeeds of the managing committee thereby providing another impetus to their vested interests but the destiny of genuine members who have not paid hefty premiums to the managing committee members was put on stake.  Many genuine members who have paid all their dues demanded by the society so far, have either not been allotted any flats or were issued allotment letters of flats on fifth and sixth floors that do not exist at all as per the approved plan, in order to accommodate those from whom huge premium/bribes have been charged thereby systematically robbing the genuine members of their flats.  Some of the members when reported this matter to Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab, it was confirmed that the allotted flat is non-existent and the Assistant Registrar suggested that a criminal police complaint should be lodged against the President and Secretary of Society <click here to see the letter (40kb only)>. Pursuant to this many members have lodged criminal complaints with Superintendent of Police, Mohali, Punjab against the President of society Mr. Swaran Singh, however no action has been taken by the Punjab Police even months after the complaints were filed.

Another complaint was filed under rule 80 with the RCS, wherein it was pleaded that the allotments made by the society vide resolutions dated 12/09/2004 and 16/02/2005, were contrary to the directions of the Registrar.  It was pointed out that no notice, no agenda, no time, no date, venue etc was given to members/Registrar for allotment of flats.  No draw of lots was held.  Allotment letters did not bear dispatch no. & date and resolutions did not indicate father’s/husband’s name or membership no. etc thus creating confusion. Some flats were not allotted at all, whereas some were allotted twice.  Taking note of the above irregularities, the Court of Deputy Registrar (Legal), passed the following orders on 27.12.2005.

"I have heard the council for the petitioners, pursued the petition, reply from respondents and the record of the society was also checked by me and some of the petitioners who appeared before me with their council.  Since the entire contents of the petition stands admitted in the written reply of the respondents and the record of the society further proves that the resolutions have been passed in the violation of Bye-Laws as no notice was issued to the members and the Registrar Cooperative Societies Punjab about the General Body Meeting, before passing resolutions dated 12/09/2004 (Annexure P2) and 16/02/2005 (Annexure P3) by the Society.  Flat No 108, 122, 123 have not been allotted at all.  Flat No 124, 137, 157, 172, 197 and 434 have been allotted twice by the Society.  Resolution Annexure P-2 does not indicate Father’s/Husband’s Name and membership No and similarly resolution Annexure P-3 does not indicate membership No and further resolution have shown cutting without authentication.  On page 1 of Annexure P-2 in column no 3, there are 14 members shown, whereas flats allotted to them are 13 only.  Similarly flat No 117 and 118 have been allotted to non-members.  This clearly shows that the previous managing committee has passed resolutions, made allotments to his near and dear ones for extraneous considerations without serving proper notice under rule 80 of the rules laid.  The allotment letters does not bear the date and dispatch nos.  Further, unauthorized allottees have been allowed un-authorised possession of the flats.  Some allottees who have not even paid cost and further installments have also been allotted flats.

 

In view of above produces record, evidence and factual position, I hereby set aside resolution Annexure P-2 dated 12.09.2004 and Annexure P-3 dated 16.09.2005 passed by the respondent No 5 – Society under rule 80 of the rules laid.  The competent authority of the society is directed to initiate legal action against unauthorized occupants as per law.  The Society may take further steps for re-allotment of flats in accordance with law to the members of the Society."

 

Click here to see the true copy of the order (93kb only)

The Supervisory Committee formed by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies to manage the affairs of the society after completion of the tenure of its managing committee, also passed the following orders on 04.12.2005. 

"Complaints from many members of this society have been received regarding the allotment of the flats which was made by the previous Managing Committee on 12.09.2004. 

 

This process of allotment undertaken by the previous managing committee in the Resolution of Annual General Body meeting is not in conformity with the provision of bye-laws of the society, instructions of RCS Punjab, principal of natural justice and fair play that is why many members are agitating against the manner in which the allotment on said date was done.  No draw of lots was undertaken in the process of allotment of flats to the members.  Thus making whole process of allotment arbitrary, discriminatory and an element of subjectivity.

 

Assistant Registrar Coop Societies, Mohali on the instructions from RCS Punjab issued a notice U/S 10A of the Punjab Coop Societies Act 1961 for amendment of bye-laws of the society which envisaged that RCS or his nominee at the time of allotment has to be present to maintain objectivity.  This notice was received by Shri Swaran Singh the then Honorary Secretary of the society on 13.07.2004, but this information was knowingly suppressed to pursue their vested interests to have the allotment done in a subjective and in an arbitrary manner to give maximum benefit to few selected members.

 

The PUDA had initially allowed to the society to construct 364 dwelling units in the allotted 9.40 acres of land.  On actual measurement of land the area of land was 8.75 acre instead of 9.40 acre.  PUDA had reduced the number of dwelling units from 364 to 338.  But the actual number of flats got allotted by the Managing Committee was more.  The Managing Committee allotted the flats on fifth and sixth floors whereas it was allowed to construct four floors only in addition to the ground floor.

 

Keeping in view the aforesaid infirmity in the manner of allotment got done by the previous managing committee, the allotment is hereby cancelled as same is not in confirmation with the provisions of bye-laws, instructions of R.C.S. Punjab, principal of natural justice and fair-play."

 

Click here to see the true copy of the order (128kb only)

However, Mr. Swaran Singh, through some beneficiary members challenged the orders of the Deputy Registrar (Legal) and Supervisory Committee in the court of Financial Commissioner (Coop).  In this regard, another 15 aggrieved members also submitted their applications to F.C.C. for impleading as party in the case.  But Sh. S. K. Sinha, F.C.C., didn’t even allow the grieving members to enter his court room on 23.01.2006 despite the fact that their applications for impleading as party in the case was fixed for hearing in the case.  The F.C.C. “dismissed” the orders of Supervisory Committee vide his following orders:

"I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and gone through the Act and record.  There is no provision in the Act for appointment of a “Supervisory Committee” at all.  Therefore, the “Supervisory Committee” appointed after the expiry of the term of appointment of the Administrator is non est and all its acts are therefore null and void in law.  However, since elections of the Managing Committee of the society is to take place on 15th and 16th of February 2006, the petitioners who claim to be member of the society may take their grievance to the new Managing Committee and get them resolved."

 

Click here to see the true copy of the order (133kb only)

The orders of F.C.C not only provided legal cover to the illegal allotments and possessions in the society but sensing the situation and support of illegally enrolled members, the F.C.C ordered the elections of society to be held within 20 days, dismissing all objections of bogus memberships and gross irregularities etc.  Further, the orders passed of 23.01.2006 were not dictated and were actually issued only after the formation of new managing committee to avoid any legal hassles in the election process.  The members of Adhoc Committee made various representations against this open loot to the highest offices in the Government of Punjab.  A delegation of members from Adhoc Committee even met the Chief Minister of Punjab to explain the case in detail and handed over a representation requesting postponement of elections and independent enquiry into the matter.  Based on the representation an enquiry was marked by the Chief Minister, <click here to see the letter vide which enquiry was marked by CM (27kb only)> but absolutely no action was taken by the cooperative department or any other authority in Punjab Government on the issue and the elections were declared as per the wishes of culprit committee members and orders of FCC. 

In a separate petition, the orders of the Deputy Registrar (Legal) dated 27.12.2005, were also “stayed” by F.C.C., Mr. S. K. Sinha, with the following orders:

"Presented today, heard operation of the impugned order dated 27.12.2005 passed by Deputy Registrar (L) Coop Societies, Punjab is stayed.  Notice be issued to the respondents.  Record be summoned.  To come up on 09.03.2006 for completion of service."

 

Click here to see the true copy of the order (49kb only)

While the orders were passed on 23.01.2006, they were actually issued after elections of the society i.e, on 06.03.2006 for the reasons better known to Mr. Sinha.  Following the stay, the case was pending with the Special Secretary (Cooperation), Punjab, Chandigarh for around eight months and just when it was about to reach its logical conclusion, the political bosses in the co-operative department again intervened to provide relief to the corrupt and culprit committee members and the case was shifted to Financial Commissioner (Co-op).  The lackadaisical approach taken by the department is providing sufficient time to the corrupt managing committee members to implement the illegal allotment thereby making it impossible to correct it and also to temper the record in their favor.  Taking full benefit of this opportunity, the President of the Society Mr. Swaran Singh, is ready to give physical possessions of another 104 flats as per the illegal allotments Many members have even started furnishing these flats in the new blocks and this is going to further aggravate/complicate the already terrible problems that the society is facing owing to the misdeeds of its managing committee members in alliance with corrupt officials.

Pursuant to the orders of F.C.C for holding the elections, the date for elections was fixed as 15/16.02.2006.  Further, the members of the Adhoc Committee and many other suffering members of the society made representations to the Returning Officer and Election Manager that old managing committee members, who were found indulging in grave malpractices such as selling the society flats, giving illegal possessions etc. should not be allowed to contest the elections.  It was also brought to their notice some of the members contesting the elections specifically Mr. Swaran Singh and his nephew Mr. Balbir Singh have not even deposited the minimum requisite amount to be eligible for voting as per the decision taken by the department. It was also brought to their notice that some F.I.Rs are also pending against these members with the police department in view of their alleged cheating the members and other grave malpractices in the society.  But the officers of the department didn't even bother to go into the merits of the objections being raised and allowed the culprit office holders of the previous managing committee to contest the elections.  Following this decision of election officers and the support of illegally inducted members, the old managing committee led by Mr. Swaran Singh, again managed to secure majority seats (4/7) in the elections and all their misdeeds such as selling the flats in open market, illegal possessions, grave financial irregularities etc. continue unabated.  However, when the members of society again raised their voice against the irregularities committed by these members during their previous tenure, the Asstt. Registrar, Mohali issued a simple letter No. 567-73 dated 23.02.2006 to the new committee requesting them to take police action against the culprits <click here to see the letter>.  He had probably thought that the culprits will be kind enough to get themselves booked.  The Adhoc Committee members thereafter raised their objections in the court of Registrar, Co-op Societies, Punjab through a petition, which is pending in the court of Deputy Registrar (Legal) since more than ten months. 

In the general body meeting held on 09.04.2006, the managing committee again tried to kill the law by passing certain sub-judice and controversial matters in their favor such as illegal allotments, possessions, audit report etc. etc. by misguiding the house.  All agendas and their decisions were pre-written in the proceeding book as it suited the managing committee and the members were misguided to sign on the proceeding book as to mark their presence in the meeting.  Thereafter the proceedings were used as if all the members have accepted the misdeeds of the managing committee.  After the meeting, the members of the society were asked to deposit more money with the society without any criteria through pick and choose inspite of the fact that there were no flats left for allotment to genuine members.  No documents were supplied to genuine members to raise bank loans or arrange the money in spite of their repeated requests so that they could be declared as defaulters at a later date.  Some of the members when raised objections to this and asked for the copies of proceeding books were turned down.  In fact the copies of many controversial proceedings are not being supplied even to the office of Assistant Registrar, Co-op, Mohali in-spite of his repeated written requests to the society president Mr. Swaran Singh.

Taking note of these serious irregularities being committed by the new managing committee, the Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Ropar, vide his following orders dated 24.05.2006 placed the managing committee under suspension and provided them an opportunity under Section 27(1) to explain their position on the irregularities listed in the orders by 15.06.2006.

"Assistant Registrar Coop Societies Mohali vide his letter No. RKI/ARCS/Mohali/1230 dated 11.05.2006 has reported that the managing committee of the United Coop House Building Society Ltd, Daon at Mohali is committing the following serious irregularities that:

 

1.        The Committee vide letter No. 567-73 dated 23.02.2006 was directed to take action against the persons/members and committee members with connivance of whom the possessions of flats were given illegally.  Further the committee was directed to get the record completed and produce to the auditor for audit, about which the managing committee of the society did not taken action.

 

2.         As the main reason of the dispute in the society was due to illegal enrolment & transfer of shares, the managing committee vide letter No. 756-58 dated 09.02.2006 was directed not to enroll/transfer any member share without the written prior approval of ARCS Mohali.  This direction was issued to check the mal-practice of the society’s managing committee as was done by the ex-committee.  But the president of the Society Sh. Swaran Singh by writing his letter No. Spl-4 dated 16.03.2006 that the committee is competent to enroll/transfer members and there is no need to get the approval of ARCS.  By doing so, the managing committee of the society cleared its way to repeat the same irregularities committed by the previous committee.

 

3.        PUDA approved construction of 338 flats but without getting the completion certificate from PUDA, 438 flats were allotted in the general body meeting dated 12.09.2004 and in this way Sh. Swaran Singh, President of the society and the then honorary secretary of the society misguided the whole house of the society by not explaining the rules & regulations.

 

The Assistant Registrar, Coop Societies Mohali reported that the most of the members of the Committee are the supporters of Sh. Swaran Singh, who are not ready to take action against the committee members who committed irregularities of the previous managing committee.  Further he recommended to remove the managing committee of the society.

 

On the recommendation of the ARCS, Mohali, I am of the view that the managing committee is persistently making default and is negligent in the performance of duties imposed on it by act, rule and bye-laws.  Before removing the managing committee under section 27(1)(a) I Balbir Singh Sohi, Deputy Registrar, Coop Societies, Ropar exercising the powers of the Registrar Coop Societies, Punjab, Chandigarh provide opportunity under Section 27(1), to explain its position on the points mentioned overleaf by 15th June 2006.  In case the reply is found un-satisfactory or is not received in the stipulated time the action shall be taken under section 27(1)(a) & 27(7).

 

Keeping in view, the general interest of the members of the society, I Balbir Singh Sohi, Deputy Registrar, Coop Societies, Ropar exercising the power of Registrar, Coop Societies, Punjab, Chandigarh suspend the managing committee of the United Coop House Building Society Limited, Daon at Mohali, under Section 27(2) of the Punjab Coop Societies Act 1961, and appoint Sh. Gurdip Singh Assistant Registrar, Coop Societies Mohali as the administrator of the society.

 

The Administrator is directed to perform his duties in accordance to the act & rules and as per directions issued by RCS, Punjab by time to time."

 

Click here to see the true copy of the order (103kb only)

However instead of resolving the irregularities or providing any explanation to the observations of Deputy Registrar, the managing committee challenged his orders in the court of Addl Registrar (Credit).  The Addl Registrar (Credit) provided the managing committee another 15 days to resolve the irregularities and file its reply <Click here to see the orders>.  However the managing committee again challenged the orders in the court of Financial Commissioner (Cooperation), Punjab, who vide his following orders dated 21.08.2006 stayed the orders of Deputy Registrar and restored the powers of Managing Committee. 

"I have considered the argument advanced by the counsel and have gone through the record of the case.  I find that the order of the Deputy Registrar dated 24.05.2006 vide which the Managing Committee has been suspended to be very perfunctory.  In a quasi judicial order, the Deputy Registrar is expected to pass a well reasoned speaking order clearly bringing out the irregularities (if any) and his findings on such irregularities.  A mere reading of the impugned order of the Deputy Registrar does not give any reason for taking such a drastic action against a legally elected managing committee of a cooperative society.  Even order dated 26.06.2006 passed by the Additional Registrar in the appeal gives no tangible grounds as to why he has confirmed the order of the Deputy Registrar regarding suspension of the Managing Committee.  The order dated 26.06.2006 of the Additional Registrar is very sketchy and non speaking.  Accordingly, the Deputy Registrar is directed to pass a reasoned and self-speaking order after considering the reply filed by the managing committee to the notice issued to it under Section 27 of the Act.  The Deputy Registrar may also hear Sh. Basant Singh, who has filed an application before this court or any other member of the society who may like to be heard in the instant case.  The Deputy Registrar will pass a final order under section 27 of the Act within a period of two months.  In the mean time, the petitioners (managing committee) will neither enroll any new member nor make any fresh allotment of the flats being constructed by the society."

 

Click here to see the true copy of the order (187kb only)

It is however learnt that the Deputy Registrar and Assistant Registrar were advised not to take any further action on the issue and accordingly no further action has been taken by them even months after the orders of Financial Commissioner (Cooperation). 

Further, the Chief Auditor (Cooperation), Punjab has never been able to complete the audit of society due to non-availability of the accounts/records in the society while the auditor namely Mr. Darbara Singh, who is always deputed by the department to carry out the audit of this society has never initiated any action to obtain the necessary record or to set the society’s accounts/records in order. However, the half baked interim audit report for the financial year 2004-05 has pointed out grave irregularities in the society, some of which are as under:

1.       Member’s register and their payment accounts are incomplete.

2.       List of members to whom the possessions were given was not available, whereas 39 possessions were given as per proceedings in violation of rules.

3.       39 members of the society were given concession of Rs. 1 Lac each in the cost of flat without any justification.

4.       Advance payment to two builders amounting to nearly 5 crore made without any justification. 

5.       No stock register of material / no tenders called for purchase of material.

6.       Committee purchasing material such as Iron and Cement at its own level but no bills were available, only payments have been made.

7.       Many more such irregularities and last but not the least "No action taken on the audit report of 31/03/2004".

Click here to see the true copy of the audit report (94kb only)

However, it can be easily comprehended that in such circumstances when the officials and politicians of the Department of Co-operation have joined the culprits in this open loot and the genuine members and being thrown out of the society and their life time savings are on stake because of their inability to bribe the culprit managing committee and corrupt officials of the cooperative department, hardly anyone is bothered about the financial irregularities in the society.   It is an open belief in the society and in the market that Mr. Swaran Singh is the sole owner of the society and can do anything whether as per law or beyond.  It is also widely accepted by his near and dear ones that he has purchased all concerned officials and politicians of the cooperative department and all of them are his Yes-Men, which is also evident from the approach of the top officials of the department.  In view of the above, the cooperative department of Punjab Government seems incapable of taking any action to stop this open loot and the managing committee of the society continues to defraud the genuine members of the society making mockery of all laws, rules and regulations. 

 

Home Scam Chronicle Latest News 283 Member List Unanswered Pending Actions Required Directory Contact Us

Copy Right 2006® to Adhoc Committee, The United Cooperative House Building Society Ltd, Mohali (India)